Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson quickly became a best selling underground. Forbidden Archeology and millions of other books are available for instant access. .. Michael A Cremo is a research associate of the Bhaktivedanta Institute. Forbidden Archeology has ratings and 48 reviews. James said: Well, I guess controversy sells. This is a horrible book. Michael Cremo has set archaeol.
|Published (Last):||16 July 2011|
|PDF File Size:||1.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Return to Book Page. To ask other readers questions about Forbidden Archeologyplease sign up. There does seem to be an orthodoxy in th scientific community that brands as heretics all those who don’t accept the status quo.
Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The authors look at each case individually, and discuss the torbidden data related to each case, both strengths and weakness, and objectively discuss various viewpoints on the most well known cases. Well, I guess controversy sells. That’s the same tabloid you see in the supermarket aisle with headlines about aliens and Bat Boy.
Looking into the admission criteria of these organizations, it is clear that membership is not tied to expertise:.
Michael Cremo – RationalWiki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Forbidden Archeology documents a systematic process of “knowledge filtration” and constitutes a serious challenge to the Darwinian theory of evolu Over the past two centuries archeologists and anthropologists have ignored, forgotten and suppressed vast quantities of evidence showing that human beings like ourselves have existed on this planet for tens of millions of years. Open Preview See a Problem? Scholars of the mainstream archaeological and paleoanthropological communities have described his work as pse Hindu creationist whose work argues that humans have lived on the earth for billions of years.
Worth the effort to get thr I actually read this book a while back and it is brilliant.
May 08, Lyrae rated it it was amazing. Let me begin with the authors’ conclusion: Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on?
Whether all their forbidden stands up or not and they’re clear on ambiguities themselves the book is a strong lesson in preconceptions and the importance of remembering that theory is not fact, and should be open to constant re-assessment. Things like anatomically modern human bones recovered from rock strata millions of years old, and manufactured artifacts recovered from similarly ancient strata.
The book is very long forbiddfn dense, cataloguing case after case after case of weak and anomalous evidence. Retrieved 23 June The book is well written with adequate definiti This book is absolutely fascinating, but it is not something you can pick up and thumb through.
It is forbdiden thus and a downside of peer reviews. Before you let yourself get swept away by Michael Cremo’s tidal wave of horseshit, just do yourself a favor and see how mainstream science has addressed his claims. My problem, and it is a personal one, is that I do not have the academic background to argue with them. Views Read Edit Fossil record. I was offended to say the least.
Michael Cremo – Wikipedia
Without a doubt this research ccremo is whole and complete and pisses off every so called research wannabee that ever crawled the planet. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. About pages full of facts that contradict 18th-century evolution theory. Refresh and try again. Early paleoanthropologists, in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth, interpreted much empirical information as evidence favoring the existence of human beings in the Tertiary period about Not certain they needed to spend so much time beating the point home which might have been done in a few chapters or one section of a book.
But this book changes the fields of anthropology and archeology to their very cores.
No stars because I didn’t finish it. This book wasn’t what I thought. This book contains numerous examples of disregarded evidence just because it did not fit into the preconcieved notions of how things progressed, illustrating how anthropology and archaeology are not ‘sciences’ if one repeatedly disregards This book made me want to major in archaeology – unfortunately, many of the college professors out there are adament against anything outside of the timeline that they believe is set in stone, even now, almost a dozen years after this book was first published.
He clearly has a religious motivation, which he acknowledges He favors a Vedic history but he keeps his religious biases out of the overt discussion in this book, unlike the works of say, creationists.
And I haven’t even gotten to the weird parts yet.
Still, their readings of the paleoarcheological and paleoanthropological records and how scientists whom don’t tow the ‘party’ line are treated is, for the most part, valid if not convincing.
Retrieved from ” https: